shivaathervedi wrote:Let me give you quotes when Shri Krishna and Shri Rama were born. This shows they were born after Adam.
Historical period of Krishna;
Shrimad Bhagvatam declares that Krishna arrives on Earth towards the end of the Dwapar Yug of the 7th Manvantar of the 1st Kalpa of the 51st year of the current Brahma.
Currently, we are in the last of the four Yugas called the Kaliyuga which, according to astronomical calculations, began on the 20th of February 3102 BCE. Now, this would place Krishna roughly around 3300-3200 BCE as the Bhagvatam states that Kaliyuga couldn't begin till Krishna was on the planet!
'Lord Ram was born in 5114 BC' | India News - Times of India
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/ind ... 273107.cms?
Good piece of research! I have no questions about the dates of Lord Ram and Lord Krishna. However I have a question mark about 6000 years attributed to Hazarat Adam.
If you consider the 1400 years of history after Hazarat Aly, there have been 49 nine Imams which gives and average Imamat of 1400/49 = 28.57 years.
Now if you consider the existing genealogies of the Imams prior to Hazarat Aly extending to Hazarat Adam, there were at the most 30 names. This is given by Fatimid Dais and Pir Sadardeen. Now if you consider the same average Imamat for the Imams prior to Hazarat Aly, then the time frame between Hazarat Adam to Hazarat Aly would be 28.57 X 30 = 857.14. Even if you add 500 years as a margin of historical error, you would still come up with 1300 years.
Now Hazarat Ali lived in 7th Century AD. Hazarat Adam would have been born at most around 600 - 1300 = 700 BC.
According to the calculations of Swami Sri Yukteshwar, the Kali Yuga began around 700 BC.
According to Pir Sadardeen, Hazarat Adam began the period of Kaliyuga.
Hence the figure of 6000 attributed to Hazart Adam is way exaggerated .
Hence Sri Krishna and Sri Ram were born much earlier than Hazarat Adam.
shivaathervedi wrote:
How many from your batch (1983-1987) became active Alwaez? What about non khoja students? As regarding late Alwaez Amlani, with due respect, he belonged to Alwaez Late Abu Ali group who opposed the changes or classification of Ginans (after all Imam's hidayat was clear on the subject). I assume that training to trainees was limited and did not cover all aspects of Ginans.?
I don't think that it matters whether the students eventually became Alwaezes. What matters is that they were given the tools to become Alwaezes and hence were well grounded in knowledge. The non-khoja students (Syrians) were also given the same exposure. All aspects of Ginas were covered.
shivaathervedi wrote:
For my informatrion, in what year Imam said to Late Alwaez 'that by mentioning Moses we don't become Jews or by saying Hindu names in Ginans we don't become Hindus'.
Were Avtars role models or every thing ethically was free for them?
Avtar is pure, that about a new born baby, Is this baby pure or not?
Of course Avtars are always pure since birth. Their actions cannot be judged according to human standards. Hence they cannot be role models.