first article of preamble of Ismaili Constitution

Discussion on doctrinal issues
Locked
zznoor
Posts: 1017
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 1:38 pm

Post by zznoor »

Admin wrote:People who practise Shariah without understanding their menaing are uneducated. In old indian languages, uneducated people are called donkey. it does not mean they are donkey in the sense of that animal with a tail and 2 large ears ;-)
This applies to all religions. Tell me how many Iailis understand true meaning of Haqikat and Marafat.
You do not have to defend this donkey comment by this person. He uses donkey and Moran at the drop of hat.
BTW for Sufis Practice of Sharia as first requirement, for them, Without it there is no progress. Wether you are donkey or human all Muslim have to fulfill Salat as a part of Sharia.
Admin
Posts: 6829
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2003 10:37 am
Contact:

Post by Admin »

At some point you have to move on. It is true that all Muslims have to start their car but some have gone beyond and push on the accelerator after starting the car and some are stuck since centuries in just starting their car and going nowhere! And some a pushing the accelerator but the steering is in the wrong direction, they just turn round and round...

Ismailis have the best GPS in the world, they have started their car and they are taking the right direction and the right speed to live in with their Time, hopefully, ahead of their Time.
mazharshah
Posts: 263
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2015 5:08 pm

Post by mazharshah »

Admin wrote:At some point you have to move on. It is true that all Muslims have to start their car but some have gone beyond and push on the accelerator after starting the car and some are stuck since centuries in just starting their car and going nowhere! And some a pushing the accelerator but the steering is in the wrong direction, they just turn round and round...

Ismailis have the best GPS in the world, they have started their car and they are taking the right direction and the right speed to live in with their Time, hopefully, ahead of their Time.
Yes the GPS of Admins and like minded so called intellectuals will land Ismailis in BLACK HOLE.
Admin
Posts: 6829
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2003 10:37 am
Contact:

Post by Admin »

mazharshah wrote:You deleted my earlier question, let me ask this way.
Pir or institution of Piratan is not mentioned in Preamble. May be Imam can not find any suitable Ma'rifati, Ismaili momin of highly ethical values for seat of Piratan.
Discuss the subject of Piratan in the appropriate thread please. Piratan is not linked to the brain or the knowledge of a person, it is linked to the Noor of Piratan which has already been discussed umpteen times in the proper thread. I will keep deleting your posts up to the time you understand the rules of posting.
mazharshah
Posts: 263
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2015 5:08 pm

Post by mazharshah »

Qadi Noaman wrote his famous book Da'aim al Islam with the permission and blessings of Imam Muiz.The book was so important that by decree Imam Muiz ask

followers to remember the book by heart. In the first chapter Willayah paragraph 78 Qadi Noaman has written, I quote;" Ali came across certain persons
who were extremists in this matter. they were beguiled by Satan's machinations and they said;You are our God, our creator, our Provider. From you is our

beginning and to you is our return. There upon Ali's face under went a great change; he perspired ; he trembled like a reed with fear of the glory

of God. May His glory be great. A GREAT ANGER CAME UPON ALI, and he ordered those around him to dig a large pit and said; verily, I shall fill this pit

with flesh and bone of these people and so he burnt them".

In paragraph 79 Qadi Noaman wrote," This is a well known story and in the time of Imams who succeeded Ali there were many such reports of considerable

length, for instance, the one named Mughira bin sa'ed, may God curse him. He was one of companions of Imam Muhammad Baqir, but Satan seduced him. He asserted that Imam Baqir was God, exalted above all is Almighty God, the lord of the worlds. He claimed that Imam Baqir sent him as apostle. Many of his companions followed him and they were called Mughairyya after his name. The Imam came to know about this heresy and was angry, but he could not kill the heretics as Ali did. So Imam Baqir cursed Mughira and his followers and dissociated himself from him and his doctrine.
Admin
Posts: 6829
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2003 10:37 am
Contact:

Post by Admin »

In Zahir it is only rarely that the Imam will disclose his Noor.

However Ismailis who have been in close private Mijlases with the Imams (whichever it is) know the Truth. Nuseiri also was killed by Hazrat Ali for saying Ali is Allah. we all know the Imam gave him back his life and protected his descendant with a guaranteed salvation. These are truths only available to Ismailis (not to those who call themselves Ismailis or are Ismailis in flesh but not in soul)
kmaherali
Posts: 25716
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2003 3:01 pm

Post by kmaherali »

mazharshah wrote:Qadi Noaman wrote his famous book Da'aim al Islam with the permission and blessings of Imam Muiz.
It all depends upon the context and audience. The Fatimid Period was very much a zaheri context and the Imams were known by the public at large as inheritors of the Prophet. Under such circumstances to publicly claim the Imam to be God would create confusion in the society, hence the Imam's anger.

Pir Shahbudin Shah in his Risalat Dar Haqiqati Deen http://www.ismaili.net/Source/0693.html writes:

Imam Ja'far Sadiq once replied to a man who asked him whether it is true that at the Day of Resurrection God will become visible to all?" Yes", -said he, -"He is visible even before that day. He is visible to His slaves from the day when He asked them: "am I not your Lord?" Do not you see Him?" The man who asked the question then replied: "O my Lord, I see thee! Give me the permission to tell this (to others) on thy authority". The Imam replied: "do not tell this to anybody, because people are stupid and ignorant, [39] they shall disbelieve you, regarding this as impiety (kufr)".

To shed more light into this issue, there was an interview conducted by Andrew Gardner of ITV on 5th June 1985 at Chantilly ( I have the whole transcript of it), in which Mawlana Hazar Imam was asked: "One of the myths surrounding you is that some people in the West think of you as a living God. Not only is that not true, but it is blasphemous?" To which MHI answered: "Absolutely. I mean, as you know the faith of Islam was revealed at a time the Arabian continent was idolatrous and idolatary - all forms of idolatary are totally prohibited by Islam. It is certainly true to say that the Western World doesn't necessarily understand the theology of Shi'ism nor indeed the theology of many mystical sects whether they are Shia or Sunni or Christian. Mysticism, in it's essence is difficult."

From the answer above, we can see that while MHI denies being God from the Zaheri point of view, there is the Batini side which is not generally understood and is difficult for general public.

But that does not mean that the Imam is not God, it is just a matter of the context in which this concept is articulated.
nuseri
Posts: 1373
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 8:54 am

Post by nuseri »

To Admin:Ya Ali Madad.
I totally agree with the essence of nuseri incident.I would like to add to it.Killing any person is an inhuman act any ignorant can do that,but to give life to cut pieces of same person is
a Miracle Which only God n god could do it not once but figure 70 times is mentioned.
This Act of Hz Ali was so propagated in those area n singularly responsible to what is almost of 50% of Shia population of today
Take away point.
1.ALI gave life to many pieces of dead body,miracales of pir was on only one piece of single dead body,
2.Nuseri place him Imaan then over the cost of life.
3.His further test of Imaan was waived till eternity but not Ibaadat n khidmat for it be given a scope to upgrade its soul to marifat,that is like salam,hallaj,nadir khusraw.
A question why the figure of 70 is mentioned.
If a miracle is enough for one act why the same act was committed 70 times ????
tret
Posts: 1195
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 2:09 pm

Post by tret »

kmaherali wrote:The Imam replied: "do not tell this to anybody, because people are stupid and ignorant, [39] they shall disbelieve you, regarding this as impiety (kufr)". ...
Everything aside, what Imam says is the "Hukm" of Farmaan to the murids and so is this one.

Do you follow that? Imam clearly says not to tell it to others! But look what's happening in this public space. Everyone is publicly shouting Ali is Allah! This is certainly not what Imam wants! Think please!
mazharshah
Posts: 263
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2015 5:08 pm

Post by mazharshah »

Admin wrote:In Zahir it is only rarely that the Imam will disclose his Noor.

However Ismailis who have been in close private Mijlases with the Imams (whichever it is) know the Truth. Nuseiri also was killed by Hazrat Ali for saying Ali is Allah. we all know the Imam gave him back his life and protected his descendant with a guaranteed salvation. These are truths only available to Ismailis (not to those who call themselves Ismailis or are Ismailis in flesh but not in soul)

I tried to find Nuseri event in the literature produced in Fatimid period, but failed. Also I could not detect this Nuseri event in Shia literature till starting of Fatimid era. If you have any reference from that time please post it, thanks.
mazharshah
Posts: 263
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2015 5:08 pm

Post by mazharshah »

kmaherali wrote:
mazharshah wrote:Qadi Noaman wrote his famous book Da'aim al Islam with the permission and blessings of Imam Muiz.
It all depends upon the context and audience. The Fatimid Period was very much a zaheri context and the Imams were known by the public at large as inheritors of the Prophet. Under such circumstances to publicly claim the Imam to be God would create confusion in the society, hence the Imam's anger.

Pir Shahbudin Shah in his Risalat Dar Haqiqati Deen http://www.ismaili.net/Source/0693.html writes:

Imam Ja'far Sadiq once replied to a man who asked him whether it is true that at the Day of Resurrection God will become visible to all?" Yes", -said he, -"He is visible even before that day. He is visible to His slaves from the day when He asked them: "am I not your Lord?" Do not you see Him?" The man who asked the question then replied: "O my Lord, I see thee! Give me the permission to tell this (to others) on thy authority". The Imam replied: "do not tell this to anybody, because people are stupid and ignorant, [39] they shall disbelieve you, regarding this as impiety (kufr)".

To shed more light into this issue, there was an interview conducted by Andrew Gardner of ITV on 5th June 1985 at Chantilly ( I have the whole transcript of it), in which Mawlana Hazar Imam was asked: "One of the myths surrounding you is that some people in the West think of you as a living God. Not only is that not true, but it is blasphemous?" To which MHI answered: "Absolutely. I mean, as you know the faith of Islam was revealed at a time the Arabian continent was idolatrous and idolatary - all forms of idolatary are totally prohibited by Islam. It is certainly true to say that the Western World doesn't necessarily understand the theology of Shi'ism nor indeed the theology of many mystical sects whether they are Shia or Sunni or Christian. Mysticism, in it's essence is difficult."

From the answer above, we can see that while MHI denies being God from the Zaheri point of view, there is the Batini side which is not generally understood and is difficult for general public.

But that does not mean that the Imam is not God, it is just a matter of the context in which this concept is articulated.


In Islamic Mysticism/Sufism Murshid is considered Khuda, as it is said;
fana fi Murshid is fana fi Rasul, and fana fi Rasul is fana fi Allah. It does not imply that in real Murshid is Allah. Murshid got this status because God wanted to raise his status, Noor is not yours to be taken but it is yours to be given.
It is a well known hadith of Imam Ja'far Sadiq that we are gates to God. Through us He is worshiped and through us He is Known. Now compare both hadiths, one you have mentioned and other I have written. Please note the wordings " through us" means through real intercessor one can approach God.
Regarding ITV interview, when asked, " but it is blasphemous", Imam replied " ABSOLUTELY ", means he denied being God.
I believe Imam is not scared of any one, then why to hide. Truth / Haqq should be open and clear. Imam is noor of Allah but not himself Allah. I am in era of Shah Karim Hazar Imam and he never claim to be God. Need clear wordings from Imam; no induce or deduce philosophy from other source.
Teenagers and new generation want clear answer.
mazharshah
Posts: 263
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2015 5:08 pm

Post by mazharshah »

nuseri wrote:To Admin:Ya Ali Madad.
I totally agree with the essence of nuseri incident.I would like to add to it.Killing any person is an inhuman act any ignorant can do that,but to give life to cut pieces of same person is
a Miracle Which only God n god could do it not once but figure 70 times is mentioned.
This Act of Hz Ali was so propagated in those area n singularly responsible to what is almost of 50% of Shia population of today
Take away point.
1.ALI gave life to many pieces of dead body,miracales of pir was on only one piece of single dead body,
2.Nuseri place him Imaan then over the cost of life.
3.His further test of Imaan was waived till eternity but not Ibaadat n khidmat for it be given a scope to upgrade its soul to marifat,that is like salam,hallaj,nadir khusraw.
A question why the figure of 70 is mentioned.
If a miracle is enough for one act why the same act was committed 70 times ????

Who is Nadir khusraw, you have quoted couple of times, is this Nadir Shah Durrani?
Your question is valid," Why the same act was committed 70 times?"
Was that not the wastage of time? Was one blow on neck not enough?
You are good at calculation, just add up how many hours wasted.
Go through early shia't history you will find many movements religious and political popped up. In comparison Nusayria and Druzia movements were almost same in doctrines. Mostly shias do not consider Nusayria and Druzia sects as part of sh'ism.
Admin
Posts: 6829
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2003 10:37 am
Contact:

Post by Admin »

Come back to the thread. Thank you.
Admin
Posts: 6829
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2003 10:37 am
Contact:

Post by Admin »

mazharshah wrote: Was one blow on neck not enough?
When someone tells you about the content of a Farman by our Imam, please do not make a mockery of that Farman. Read the rules of posting. This is an Ismaili Forum. The story of Nuseri as recounted above is in Farmans. Did you know it?
kmaherali
Posts: 25716
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2003 3:01 pm

Post by kmaherali »

tret wrote:Do you follow that? Imam clearly says not to tell it to others! But look what's happening in this public space. Everyone is publicly shouting Ali is Allah! This is certainly not what Imam wants! Think please!
We have been through this before!

First of all this site is one of the millions of websites existing today. Even though it is accessible to all, only an infinite minority accesses the forums. It is like a drop in the ocean. In fact there are only a handful of individuals who actually participate regularly.

Also it is very difficult for anyone to access information on this site, even for someone familiar like yourself. I remember you asking for a repost of a Farman posted 2 weeks earlier! Ali Allah is not written all over the forums.

Hence it is very different than shouting aloud in the streets! So don't think that just because it is accessible by everyone, it is a public forum - a zaheri domain. Infact for all practical purposes, it is really a batini site.If that is the case, then I don't see a reason why we should not leverage the technology for promoting the understanding of the batini aspects of our faith. If we do not discuss it here, where else are we to discuss it?
kmaherali
Posts: 25716
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2003 3:01 pm

Post by kmaherali »

mazharshah wrote:In Islamic Mysticism/Sufism Murshid is considered Khuda, as it is said;
fana fi Murshid is fana fi Rasul, and fana fi Rasul is fana fi Allah. It does not imply that in real Murshid is Allah. Murshid got this status because God wanted to raise his status, Noor is not yours to be taken but it is yours to be given.
It is a well known hadith of Imam Ja'far Sadiq that we are gates to God. Through us He is worshiped and through us He is Known. Now compare both hadiths, one you have mentioned and other I have written. Please note the wordings " through us" means through real intercessor one can approach God.
Regarding ITV interview, when asked, " but it is blasphemous", Imam replied " ABSOLUTELY ", means he denied being God.
I believe Imam is not scared of any one, then why to hide. Truth / Haqq should be open and clear. Imam is noor of Allah but not himself Allah. I am in era of Shah Karim Hazar Imam and he never claim to be God. Need clear wordings from Imam; no induce or deduce philosophy from other source.
Teenagers and new generation want clear answer.
So you are saying that it is possible for an individual to be fanna fi Allah - be one with God, but a Mursheed who guides you to fanna is not himself fanna. Don't you think it is absurd? It is like saying that I can guide you to a destination but I am not there myself! What about the Paris Conference statement of Imam being the Mazhar of Allah?

What is the need to quote hadiths of Imams mentioned several centuries ago when we have clear Farmans of our 48th and 49th Imams. Didn't you say that you follow the present Imam.

Do you think it is appropriate to declare infront of a TV audience that 'I am God"? How can the world understand such a statement? It is not a matter of being afraid. It is about speaking according to the capacity of the audience.

Imam is very clear in his Farmans about who he is. There is no confusion about that.
tret
Posts: 1195
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 2:09 pm

Post by tret »

kmaherali wrote:
tret wrote:Do you follow that? Imam clearly says not to tell it to others! But look what's happening in this public space. Everyone is publicly shouting Ali is Allah! This is certainly not what Imam wants! Think please!
We have been through this before!

First of all this site is one of the millions of websites existing today. Even though it is accessible to all, only an infinite minority accesses the forums. It is like a drop in the ocean. In fact there are only a handful of individuals who actually participate regularly.

Also it is very difficult for anyone to access information on this site, even for someone familiar like yourself. I remember you asking for a repost of a Farman posted 2 weeks earlier! Ali Allah is not written all over the forums.

Hence it is very different than shouting aloud in the streets! So don't think that just because it is accessible by everyone, it is a public forum - a zaheri domain. Infact for all practical purposes, it is really a batini site.If that is the case, then I don't see a reason why we should not leverage the technology for promoting the understanding of the batini aspects of our faith. If we do not discuss it here, where else are we to discuss it?
This is your understanding. I disagreed then, as I do now.
Whatever is in public space CAN BE ACCESSED by public. You can't simply assume that the information in this space "it's hard to find". And certainly not safe to assume that this is a "closed group" and only Ismailis access it.

But regardless of public/private space, the point is that the Imam, under no circumstances wants this to be said! Whatever you believe is YOUR PERSONAL thing, and should be kept personal. That's why MHI said it's a PERSONAL FREE INQUIRY! Let everyone find for themselves.

I
kmaherali
Posts: 25716
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2003 3:01 pm

Post by kmaherali »

tret wrote:This is your understanding. I disagreed then, as I do now.
Whatever is in public space CAN BE ACCESSED by public. You can't simply assume that the information in this space "it's hard to find". And certainly not safe to assume that this is a "closed group" and only Ismailis access it.

But regardless of public/private space, the point is that the Imam, under no circumstances wants this to be said! Whatever you believe is YOUR PERSONAL thing, and should be kept personal. That's why MHI said it's a PERSONAL FREE INQUIRY! Let everyone find for themselves.

I
It is under no circunstances to be said outside the Jamat for sure, but certainly within the Jamat it has to be said, else how are we to impart this understanding to others. The Imams have said it in their Farmans and the Pirs have said it in the Ginans.

These days even matters said in JKs are accessible to the non-Ismailis. So there is nothing as absolutely Ismaili only space anymore.

This is very much a private batini forum for all intents and purposes and should be considered as such.
ismaili103
Posts: 542
Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:40 am

Post by ismaili103 »

Was one blow on neck not enough?
" Imaan anmol cheez hai aur Mowla ko pyari hai. Hamarey dada hazrat Mowla Murtaza Ali ko Momin Nuseri Allah kehta tha. Usey sattar(70) martaba qatal kia gaya lekin phir bhi wo Ali Allah kehta rha. Baad mai hukum aya ke yeh sachcha momin hai aur us ki aulaad bhi sachchaai wali hogi. Is momin aur us ki aulaad ko qayamat mai jawab dehi nahi hogi. Ye darja usse us ke Imaan ke aiwaz mila tha." ( Imam Sultan Mohd Shah ).

Is this farman of Imam is enough for you or you are looking for any sunni baba to confirm it.
nuseri
Posts: 1373
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 8:54 am

Post by nuseri »

To Admin.Ya ALI madad.
Please post my message that I have emailed to you. I was unable to connect to the site whole day.I cannot retype it.
nuseri
Posts: 1373
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 8:54 am

Post by nuseri »

Ya Ali Madad.
In last few years,MHI has been telling n even few days back that even the educated world debates are Clash of ignorance, because it devoids the baatin essence.
Even the debate of totally ignorant cunning being n a wise member with little ignorance ,I see it Clash of ignorance.
As to interview of ITV of 1985.
1)as a set protocol ,first point of question is answered first,if not the replies clearly has to say I am answering the second line or part first. It did not happen here.
2) the interviewer look amateur the way he placed his world n before waiting for reply.he imposes his own belief as to help The Agakhan in reply.
Question.
one of the myths surrounding you.
Is that some people think you are living
God.(full stop).Answer :ABSOLUTELY.(full stop)
Not only that is true,but it is blasphemous?
Answer. I mean that you know that the faith of Islam
was revealed at time of Arabian continent was
Idolatry n and all form of idolatary is prohibted
the second part was not Question but a statement of belief of the interviewer.
To MHI replied by relating the word blasphemous to idolatry at start of Islam.very cleverly.
Read word by word.
Later Mhi uses the word ' true' not the word blasphemous but for the western world DOESN'T understand theology of mystical sects( read as essence in Sufism).and beautifully ending the answer with 'Mysticism in its ESSENCE is difficult.
He spoke to the truth.only fools n igonarant read n understand it blindly.
He affirmed the fine line of question.
Is was Not at All a negative reply like ' I am not XXX'.
mazharshah
Posts: 263
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2015 5:08 pm

Post by mazharshah »

ismaili103 wrote:
Was one blow on neck not enough?
" Imaan anmol cheez hai aur Mowla ko pyari hai. Hamarey dada hazrat Mowla Murtaza Ali ko Momin Nuseri Allah kehta tha. Usey sattar(70) martaba qatal kia gaya lekin phir bhi wo Ali Allah kehta rha. Baad mai hukum aya ke yeh sachcha momin hai aur us ki aulaad bhi sachchaai wali hogi. Is momin aur us ki aulaad ko qayamat mai jawab dehi nahi hogi. Ye darja usse us ke Imaan ke aiwaz mila tha." ( Imam Sultan Mohd Shah ).

Is this farman of Imam is enough for you or you are looking for any sunni baba to confirm it.

First you should have read the post of Nuseri dated Nov15, 2015 in which he
wrote," why the figure of 70 is mentioned" I was just replying to him.
I never mock Farman. MSMS narrated the story. Just iman on Ali is not sufficient for salvation, there are other duties religious and ethical necessary for Nijaat. My sunni baba according to Bhuj Nirijan BY pIR Sadruddin is;

AAPEY MULLA AAPEY QAZI
AAPEY PARHEY SO AAP NAMAZI. ( Part 24 )
mazharshah
Posts: 263
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2015 5:08 pm

Post by mazharshah »

kmaherali wrote:
mazharshah wrote:In Islamic Mysticism/Sufism Murshid is considered Khuda, as it is said;
fana fi Murshid is fana fi Rasul, and fana fi Rasul is fana fi Allah. It does not imply that in real Murshid is Allah. Murshid got this status because God wanted to raise his status, Noor is not yours to be taken but it is yours to be given.
It is a well known hadith of Imam Ja'far Sadiq that we are gates to God. Through us He is worshiped and through us He is Known. Now compare both hadiths, one you have mentioned and other I have written. Please note the wordings " through us" means through real intercessor one can approach God.
Regarding ITV interview, when asked, " but it is blasphemous", Imam replied " ABSOLUTELY ", means he denied being God.
I believe Imam is not scared of any one, then why to hide. Truth / Haqq should be open and clear. Imam is noor of Allah but not himself Allah. I am in era of Shah Karim Hazar Imam and he never claim to be God. Need clear wordings from Imam; no induce or deduce philosophy from other source.
Teenagers and new generation want clear answer.
So you are saying that it is possible for an individual to be fanna fi Allah - be one with God, but a Mursheed who guides you to fanna is not himself fanna. Don't you think it is absurd? It is like saying that I can guide you to a destination but I am not there myself! What about the Paris Conference statement of Imam being the Mazhar of Allah?

What is the need to quote hadiths of Imams mentioned several centuries ago when we have clear Farmans of our 48th and 49th Imams. Didn't you say that you follow the present Imam.

Do you think it is appropriate to declare infront of a TV audience that 'I am God"? How can the world understand such a statement? It is not a matter of being afraid. It is about speaking according to the capacity of the audience.

Imam is very clear in his Farmans about who he is. There is no confusion about that.

When I wrote Fana fi real Murshid is fana fi Allah, means I already believe in this notion. My question is fana fi whom, obviously that is Allah. When you are using the preposition FI means you are talking of two different entities merged. A drop merged with ocean does not mean drop is equivalent to ocean. Look at the weight of drop and weight of ocean or depth of drop and ocean. There are thousands of persons claiming that they are fana, are they all walking talking Gods. Do you want me to hold hand of one of such person and say," uncle make me fana!".
nuseri
Posts: 1373
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 8:54 am

Post by nuseri »

Ya ALI madad.
Is the ginan bhur/bhuj niranjan ginan a part of current ginans approved for recitation in Jk?
If not then these verses to be dismissed at ENTRY level for debate.
If one observes closely that Pirs have used over 30 names,titles,attributes in word trying to add rhythm to their poem.
They said those to Hindu audience who were open to vedic background words n also said to muslims then praising an entity as Allah( that ginan may be in circulation) and also portray entity of existing religious word to to show an entity as a pious person.
It is to all entity is LIVING n not formless in imagination.
Picking up two lines if it is part of a say 40-60 lines poem co linking each lines in legal terms is distortion of fact n placing a point out of context is contempt of court .
Aap/aape can be the opposite person who could have been a head of mosque to pirs must be addressing or used it for an entity,if used so then all other word used in ten lines before it 10 lines after it also stands valid or invalid.
Over to copy pasters to to copy pasted the words used for an entity to impress upon different sets of audience by Pirs.
Please put ALL WORDS used to portray an entity in each line In that ginan in topic.
ismaili103
Posts: 542
Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:40 am

Post by ismaili103 »

Just iman on Ali is not sufficient for salvation
No one here said that only iman on Ali is sufficient for salvation. Pir already tell us which are good things to be do e to achieve salvation, go and read bavan boudh, bavan ghaati, so kirya etc. but above every thing Iman is important.
ismaili103
Posts: 542
Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:40 am

Post by ismaili103 »

A drop merged with ocean does not mean drop is equivalent to ocean
So what is it, Go to the atlantic ocean and drop a drop of water in it and then tell everybody that this is Atlantic ocean and in this there is a drop of water from my nestle mineral water, which is totally different from the ocean . They will start laughing at you.

I guess you are literate enough to understand evaporation cycle. The water in ponds, lake and in mineral bottle in your fridge were once an ocean but because of evaporation they separate from ocean and fall on earth as rain. Whenever they merge with ocean they became ocean.

I don't know about you, but I was definitely an ocean and now I am a drop of water separated from ocean, my aim is to merge with that ocean and become that ocean.
kmaherali
Posts: 25716
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2003 3:01 pm

Post by kmaherali »

mazharshah wrote: Just iman on Ali is not sufficient for salvation, there are other duties religious and ethical necessary for Nijaat. My sunni baba according to Bhuj Nirijan BY pIR Sadruddin is;

AAPEY MULLA AAPEY QAZI
AAPEY PARHEY SO AAP NAMAZI. ( Part 24 )
Of course Iman without Farmanbardari is no Iman. All duties are encompassed in the Farmanbardari.

The Part 24 of Buj Nirinjan refers to the state of enlightened person if you consider the whole part given at:

http://www.ismaili.net/granths/bujniran ... 33.html#24

aape mullaa aape kaazhee
aape padde so aap namaazee........................................5

He himself is the priest and He is the judge and He is the prayer leader and He is the performer of prayer.

i.e. he is his own judge, his own prayer leader and he performs his prayes as well - in other words he is Allah himself.
mazharshah wrote: When I wrote Fana fi real Murshid is fana fi Allah, means I already believe in this notion. My question is fana fi whom, obviously that is Allah. When you are using the preposition FI means you are talking of two different entities merged. A drop merged with ocean does not mean drop is equivalent to ocean. Look at the weight of drop and weight of ocean or depth of drop and ocean. There are thousands of persons claiming that they are fana, are they all walking talking Gods. Do you want me to hold hand of one of such person and say," uncle make me fana!".)
Actually to become fanna means: 'the drop becomes the Ocean'.

There can be many individuals who become the Ocean and hence 'share' in the Ocean-ness.

I have not come across anyone claiming to be fanna. In our Tariqah one is not supposed to say anything about his/her spiritual state according to the Farman of the Imam.

Only the Imam in our tariqah is the recognised fanna in our tariqah, the rest are hidden.

Of course you have to apply your judgement in determining whether one who claims to be fanna is authentic or not.
kmaherali
Posts: 25716
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2003 3:01 pm

Post by kmaherali »

nuseri wrote:Ya ALI madad.
Is the ginan bhur/bhuj niranjan ginan a part of current ginans approved for recitation in Jk?
Yes, it has been published by the ITREB of Canada. It does contain useful information and wisdom for those on the Path.
nuseri
Posts: 1373
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 8:54 am

Post by nuseri »

To Kmaherali:Ya ALI Madad.
I have asked a narrow specific question whether whole or part of Bhuj niranjan is recited.
Publication is not important,it only validates the past data but not totally endorsed its content at of/as high spirituality.
Same way IIS has published many book on Fatimid era n also on qadi moman.they are static academic material by faculty to keep their salary going.
No original thinking seen anywhere.
If this ginan is recited regularly, then I wish to know all n all words used to describe Imam of the time then.every words.
Are scholars supposed to have their own mind or repost the past minds who lived in those era,period,circumstances, audience n geopolitical status then.
MHI has told to read n understand the Fatimid era,where original intellect work n finding got known and base was ibaadat.
They did not produce material before that era material copy paste pre Fatimid era.maybe a scholar like Qadi gone into paste copy then.
Repeat of Fatimid era.mean international level prestations of original thinking and not repeating n printing glory of that era again n again.
Understanding IMAM is not a work of an ignorant.
nuseri
Posts: 1373
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 8:54 am

Post by nuseri »

To Kmaherali:Ya ALI Madad.
I have asked a narrow specific question whether whole or part of Bhuj niranjan is recited.
Publication is not important,it only validates the past data but not totally endorsed its content at of/as high spirituality.
Same way IIS has published many book on Fatimid era n also on qadi moman.they are static academic material by faculty to keep their salary going.
No original thinking seen anywhere.
If this ginan is recited regularly, then I wish to know all n all words used to describe Imam of the time then.every words.
Are scholars supposed to have their own mind or repost the past minds who lived in those era,period,circumstances, audience n geopolitical status then.
MHI has told to read n understand the Fatimid era,where original intellect work n finding got known and base was ibaadat.
They did not produce material before that era material copy paste pre Fatimid era.maybe a scholar like Qadi gone into paste copy then.
Repeat of Fatimid era.mean international level prestations of original thinking and not repeating n printing glory of that era again n again.
Understanding IMAM is not a work of an ignorant.
Locked